W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2002

RE: Closing XML Protocol Last Call issue 395

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 08:07:12 -0800
Message-ID: <68B95AA1648D1840AB0083CC63E57AD6097C68D1@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

>I'm not sure why this issues revolves around the internal 
>subset. We explicitly prohibit the Document Type Declaration 
>Information Item from appearing. If there is no DTD then there 
>is no internal or external subset. Lexically one cannot have 
><!DOCTYPE ... in a SOAP message. 

That's my understanding too leaving only such things as well-known
entities like &amp; etc. 

I guess one could entertain the idea of defining a serialization that
introduces a DTD which is not reflected in the SOAP message infoset.
Similarly one could imagine defining other information items such as
additional attributes or elements that are also not reflected in the
SOAP message infoset.

It is not clear to me, however, that a straight forward reading of the
Infoset spec would enable such additional information items to be
present as it would require some form of agreed infoset transformation
to be performed by the communicating parties. The definition of the
"application/soap+xml" media type certainly doesn't elude to such a

Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 11:07:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:22 UTC