W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Draft of position on SOAP's use of XML Internal subset

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 23:18:30 -0500
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Cc: "fallside@us.ibm.com" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF5959C52A.7EF7AF6E-ON85256C86.00179A7B@lotus.com>

Interesting suggestion, but I'm not sure it actually fits this particular 
note, the purpose of which is to report the reasons that led the protocols 
WG to the decision we made.  I don't recall anyone in the WG referencing 
the RFC, so historically I'm not sure it's the reason WE made the 
decision.  I certainly think it would be a sensible pointer to contribute 
to the Tag discussion (unless someone on the Protocols WG corrects me that 
we did use the IETF draft as motivation.)  Thanks in any case.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------







Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
12/04/2002 10:57 PM

 
        To:     "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
        cc:     "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "fallside@us.ibm.com" 
<fallside@us.ibm.com>
        Subject:        Re: Draft of position on SOAP's use of XML Internal subset



i think it would be worthwhile to reference the IETF RFC on "XML best
practices," particular around the "external entities make security
types nervous" part.
                 /r$
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 23:20:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT