W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

RE: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Locally vs. Globally Scoped

From: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:50:33 -0400
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OKEBJFDOCNPMPLOONLOIOEJKCBAA.asirv@webmethods.com>
> label is a QName, end of story

+ 1

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:28 PM
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Locally vs. Globally Scoped


 The issue about us keeping the distinction between locally and
globally scoped labels has also been commented on by me in [1]
and Martin Gudgin replied in [2]:
 "We do use the distinction in 3.1.3. I guess we Could just say
the label is a QName, end of story."

 Let me propose that we go exactly this path - just making a 
label a qname, and removing the appropriate part of section 3.1.3 
which won't be needed then. I'd leave the appropriate changes to 
the editors.

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0137.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0198.html
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 10:50:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT