W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node?

From: Martin Gudgin <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:11:38 +0100
Message-ID: <017b01c1e6b0$ab1a61b0$b47ba8c0@zerogravitas>
To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <asirv@webmethods.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, <em@w3.org>
Dan,

The editors copy is still changing subject to resolution of certain
outstanding issues. So, yes the SOAP Data Model and SOAP Encoding MAY change
between now and publication of the Last Call WD. However, on this particular
point it looks like the WG in general is happy with the current draft.

There are still other outstanding issues to resolve, the main one being
whether some way of labeling graph roots is needed.

Gudge

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
To: "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <asirv@webmethods.com>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org>; <em@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node?


>
> Is this bit of the (editors copy of) the 1.2 Adjuncts spec still changing?
>
> I've heard RDF folk are peeking at it in advance of official
publication...
>
> Should they wait until this point is settled before attempting a
> compare/contrast with the RDF Syntax graph encoding conventions?
>
> Dan
>
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, David Fallside wrote:
>
> >
> > Asir, the WG discussed this question today and was in agreement with
> > Martin's response. Do you agree?
> >
> > ............................................
> > David C. Fallside, IBM
> > Ext Ph: 530.477.7169
> > Int  Ph: 544.9665
> > fallside@us.ibm.com
> >
> >
> >
> > |---------+----------------------------->
> > |         |           "Martin Gudgin"   |
> > |         |           <martin.gudgin@btc|
> > |         |           onnect.com>       |
> > |         |           Sent by:          |
> > |         |           xml-dist-app-reque|
> > |         |           st@w3.org         |
> > |         |                             |
> > |         |                             |
> > |         |           04/16/2002 05:38  |
> > |         |           AM                |
> > |         |                             |
> > |---------+----------------------------->
> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------|
> >   |
|
> >   |       To:       <asirv@webmethods.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
|
> >   |       cc:
|
> >   |       Subject:  Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an
edge or node?                                          |
> >   |
|
> >   |
|
> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------|
> >
> >
> >
> > This has been discussed at some length on this list ( see the thread
> > at[1] ). I do not find it incohrent to state that an EII can represent
both
> > an outbound edge and the node that edge terminates at.
> >
> > Gudge
> >
> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0115.html
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Asir S Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>
> > To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:08 PM
> > Subject: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node?
> >
> >
> > > I raised this issue on March 20th, 2002 [1]. Original text is,
> > >
> > > "[Comment F] Section 3.1.5, rule 1, "if the element information item
> > > representing the graph node .. " - it contradicts with section 3.1.1
> > (says
> > > that EII represents an edge)"
> > >
> > > In brief, does the EII represent an edge or node? I believe that it
> > > represents an edge.
> > >
> > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0193.html
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Asir S Vedamuthu
> > >
> > > webMethods, Inc.
> > > 703-460-2513 or asirv@webmethods.com
> > > http://www.webmethods.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 04:11:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT