W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Updated proposal for issue 192

From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:39:21 -0400
Message-ID: <3CB44E99.4020405@sun.com>
To: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
CC: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, henrikn@microsoft.com, moreau@crf.canon.fr, xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1

Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM wrote:

> Stuart Williams writes:
> 
> 
>>>These are locally scoped, unqualified elements whose
>>>'meaning' is scoped by their containment in a 
>>><env:Fault/> element.
>>>
> 
> Yes, and <Body> only has meaning within an <Envelope>, and we qualify 
> that?  Though I don't think things are hugely broken, I think we should be 
> consistent.  On balance, I would recommend qualifying everything.  Having 
> only <Envelope> qualified, but not anything else seems quite fragile to 
> me.  It's also in some sense an artifact of how you view the description 
> of the SOAP envelope, creeping into the syntax of the envelope itself.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 10:40:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT