W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

RE: Summarizing the last 192 discussion

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:24:04 -0800
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D06F996AB@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

>This appears to be the status quo, right?  Given the obvious split in
>opinions here, and that the default HTTP binding doesn't say what to
>do with a fault on a 200 response, I'm confident that there will be
>interoperability problems.

I think it might be even simpler: we don't have to say anything about
whether the SOAP fault is subordinate to the HTTP fault or vice verse -
they *are* in sync by definition of the binding. FWIW, I don't think the
notion of a fault-hint is useful and would be happy with it not being

Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:25:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:19 UTC