> I think it might be even simpler: we don't have to say anything about > whether the SOAP fault is subordinate to the HTTP fault or vice verse - > they *are* in sync by definition of the binding. Now I'm confused. 8-/ I used to believe this, when I thought that faultHint was authoritative, but now I wonder how you could say that when, AFAICT, nowhere in the binding does it distinguish between a fault received on a 200 response, and one received on a 500 response. Both end up in the success state, and only the faultHint distinguishes one from the other. > FWIW, I don't think the > notion of a fault-hint is useful and would be happy with it not being > there. Woohoo, agreement! 8-) MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.comReceived on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:45:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT