- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:38:20 -0500
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> I think it might be even simpler: we don't have to say anything about > whether the SOAP fault is subordinate to the HTTP fault or vice verse - > they *are* in sync by definition of the binding. Now I'm confused. 8-/ I used to believe this, when I thought that faultHint was authoritative, but now I wonder how you could say that when, AFAICT, nowhere in the binding does it distinguish between a fault received on a 200 response, and one received on a 500 response. Both end up in the success state, and only the faultHint distinguishes one from the other. > FWIW, I don't think the > notion of a fault-hint is useful and would be happy with it not being > there. Woohoo, agreement! 8-) MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:45:56 UTC