W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces

From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:36:10 +0000
Message-ID: <3BF0F79A.1050801@sun.com>
To: Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
CC: hugo@w3.org, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com wrote:
> Mark Hadley writes:
>>>Thus 2 and 3 should be treated as version 
> errors whereas 4 would be a "Client" fault.
> I think I agree, at least in the case of the root element. Does the same 
> reasoning apply to, e.g. the immediate children of <envelope> (which are 
> expected to be Header, Body, etc.)?  Thanks.
I think the same reasoning should apply. Once the receiver has 
established that the sender is sending a SOAP 1.2 envelope (by checking 
the namespace on the root element) then any malformation of the envelope 
would be a "Client" fault. This would include things like wrong element 
names, multiple "Header" or "Body" elements, etc.


Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 05:38:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:16 UTC