W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces

From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:55:51 -0500
To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Cc: hugo@w3.org, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFA57F9EE1.D211492C-ON85256B02.006E218E@lotus.com>
Mark Hadley writes:

>> Thus 2 and 3 should be treated as version 
errors whereas 4 would be a "Client" fault.

I think I agree, at least in the case of the root element. Does the same 
reasoning apply to, e.g. the immediate children of <envelope> (which are 
expected to be Header, Body, etc.)?  Thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                                    Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp.                            Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 15:06:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:04 GMT