W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2001

RE: Mapping XMLP glossary onto SOAP spec

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 11:55:23 -0800
To: "'Frank DeRose'" <frankd@tibco.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D0297CA9D@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

I think we might have reached some sort of resolution on targeting in
the thread on SOAP actor model [1] and [2] where Staurt summarizes it as

	Basically: The answer to the question "What sort
	of thing is an SOAP header/XMLP block target at?"
	is "A SOAP/XMLP processor and/or it's associated

I think it is ok that this is not described in the glossary but rather
in the AM (we also don't mention mustUnderstand).


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Mar/0145.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Mar/0128.html

>If we go with the current XML protocol terminology, I would 
>recommend substituting the term "module" for the SOAP term 
>"actor" in the prose below. I stuck with "actor" here to 
>maintain familiarity with SOAP. </quote>
>Your mapping doesn't relate the SOAP:actor attribute to either 
>an XMLP module (or to an XMLP handler). Does this need to be fixed?
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2001 14:55:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:12 UTC