W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2001

RE: Summary of the binding discussion (was Re: Protocol Bindings)

From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:40:24 -0700
Message-ID: <753B28EF1C2DD411AF1C00B0D0202CB5014D417E@mailhost.hq.allegis.com>
To: "'Hugo Haas'" <hugo@w3.org>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Thanks for the summary. I think this is useful to those of us outside the
WG. However, I wasn't quite clear on what people meant by the references to
"framing", and found no references to this in the abstract model or the SOAP
1.2 draft spec. Maybe I'm just dense on this, but perhaps a brief blurb
elaborating what folks mean by "framing" in this context would be helpful to
outside observers like myself who haven't been immersed in the debate.

Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:39 PM
> To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: Summary of the binding discussion (was Re: Protocol Bindings)
> 
> 
> Since I was losing track of all the arguments/questions seen in this
> thread, I tried to make a summary of the thread:
> 
>       http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/07/12-transport-binding
> 
> I am making this publicly available in case somebody would find that
> useful.
> 
> Note that this is my interpretation of the emails, so the summaries
> might not reflect adequately what the author was trying to say.  Feel
> free to send corrections/additions.
> 
> I need to add links to the mail archive but I am running short on
> time, so I will take care of that later. 
> 
> -- 
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - 
> tel:+1-617-452-2092
> 
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 19:40:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:02 GMT