Of course, the subject should read 2001... Gudge ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com> To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com> Cc: "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>; "soapbuilders" <soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:06 PM Subject: Re: 2000 Schemas for SOAP 1.1 > > I know we produced schemas for SOAP 1.2 that are compliant with the XML > > Schema Rec. > > > > Would it be useful to produce similar schemas for SOAP 1.1? > > > > Martin Gudgin > > DevelopMentor > > Yes, most definitely. In fact, most SOAP interop testing that is going > on these days seems to be focused on using the official CR (even though > the spec explicitly references a particular draft version). > Particularly useful would be nailing down all the "aliases" that the > SOAP encoding provides (SOAP-ENC:duration, etc.) > > /r$ > > -- > Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures, > Encryption) > http://www.zolera.comReceived on Tuesday, 10 July 2001 08:18:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:02 GMT