W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2001

RE: Protocol Bindings

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:07:30 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F192532@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Krishna Sankar'" <ksankar@cisco.com>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Hi Krishna,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com]
> Sent: 09 July 2001 17:53
> To: Williams, Stuart; 'Henrik Frystyk Nielsen'; Mark Nottingham
> Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Protocol Bindings
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
>   |It might be good to test that assumption by creating a couple of really
>   |useful extension modules... anyone fancy a crack at a multi-hop
reliable
>   |sequenced delivery (in spare non-WG time of course).
> 
> 	I think ebXML has the choreographed, reliable, sequenced delivery
over SOAP
> using conversation ID, messageID,refToMessageId et al. It would be a good
> exercise to test ebXML as well as BizTalk to see how they are extending
SOAP
> to add application protocol functionalities.
> 
> 	Stuart, is this what you mean ?

I wasn't specifically thinking of ebXML when I uttered my remarks, but it
seems like a reasonable place to look for a reliable messaging extension.

> 	just my 0.01$ !
> 
> cheers

Ta,

Stuart
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2001 08:07:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:02 GMT