W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2001

RE: Encoding: mandate validation of XML Schema simple types?

From: Matt Long <mlong@phalanxsys.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:12:57 -0600
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <IDELJKFACMAJNLPNGAAFGEKECEAA.mlong@phalanxsys.com>
Jacek,

What is the your position for not validating XSD intrinsic types?

Thx,

-Matt

W. Matthew Long
Phalanx Systems, LLC
Creating the Future Now...

Telephone: 901-861-1134
Toll Free: 888-204-1757
Email: mlong@phalanxsys.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 1:17 PM
> To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: Encoding: mandate validation of XML Schema simple types?
> 
> 
>  Hi all. 8-)
>  During the F2F test cases generation, Noah said he felt our spec
> should mandate validating the XML Schema built-in simple types
> (those listed in the XML Schema - Datatypes spec).
>  I thought that this was unnecessary. What do others think?
>  If we decide SOAP Encoding processors MUST validate XML Schema
> simple types, we'll need a new SOAP Encoding fault code, for
> example enc:InvalidData to cover faulting.
>  Best regards
> 
>                    Jacek Kopecky
> 
>                    Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
>                    http://www.systinet.com/
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 9 December 2001 22:14:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 22:28:13 UTC