W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

Re: [DR200] Specification of program/object etc by URI

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 16:01:48 -0800
Message-ID: <011701c04f60$6adeb990$c24efea9@greyarea>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "XML Protocol Comments" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
A follow up. I'd actually like the spec to allow ANY mapping from request
message to implementation including phase of the moon, current US president,
what the web server had for breakfast. I don't think XP should mandate IN
ANY WAY how an XP application maps a given request to a given
implementation.

Gudge

P.S. The end of the second line of my message below should have read;

    the namespace URIs *of* the element

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
To: "XML Protocol Comments" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 3:02 PM
Subject: [DR200] Specification of program/object etc by URI


> It's not clear to me whether this is talking about end-points ( the URI
the
> request message is sent to ) or the namespace URIs or the element
> information items used to represent the request message. I'd like the
> requirement to allow either method of mapping to an implementation and I'm
> not sure what the intent is here.
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 19:03:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT