W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

RE: [DR 307] : Complex wording.

From: David Ezell <David_E3@Verifone.Com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 13:44:10 -0500
Message-ID: <472E220BA79DD11186340060B06B38D9033AD096@tpantmail1.ssr.hp.com>
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> XP MUST be suitable for widespread use across organisational 
> boundaries
> in support of the application use cases supplied elsewhere in this
> document. This implies making the XP specification simple to 
> understand
> and to implement correctly (see also DR301, DR301a, DR303).

On Wed 11/15/2000 12:07 PM+5:00 William L. Anderson wrote:
>I don't understand what is meant by "organisational boundaries." Examples,

"organisational boundaries" would be boundaries which exist between
entities (systems, divisions, companies, countries, clubs, or tribes)
such that few assumptions can be made about the computational environment
on the other side (e.g. CORBA, COM, RMI, Java, C-Sharp, C++, whatever).
"Entities" is a little too broad.

Other suggestions?

(N.B. "organisational" should be changed to "organizational".)

Hope this helps. 
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 13:44:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:10 UTC