> -----Original Message----- > From: Constantine Plotnikov [mailto:cap@mail.novosoft.ru] > Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 6:36 AM > To: Dave Winer > Cc: Box, Don; SOAP@discuss.develop.com; Tim O'Reilly > (E-mail); timbl@w3.org; tbray@textuality.com; > ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us; Daniel.Veillard@w3.org; > connolly@w3.org; eric@w3.org; xml-dist-app@w3.org; Henrik > Frystyk Nielsen (E-mail); Steve Vinoski (E-mail) > Subject: Re: A personal plea for peace and just a wee bit of > patience (and I do mean a wee bit) > > > "Box, Don" wrote: > > > > No one had concrete criticisms of the SOAP serialization > format. That does > > not mean it is perfect. However, it means that no one who > has looked at the > > spec has any credible technical show-stoppers that they are > willing to share > > in an open forum. > > > I personally like XMI 1.1 serialization algorithm more. Many of us have familiar at XMI and MOF in general. However, I believe the OMG is in the process of revamping the XMI encoding, which was done prior to namespaces and schema language. One of my personal goals is to make obvious how XMI fits into this picture. DB http://www.develop.com/dboxReceived on Friday, 3 March 2000 13:34:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 12 October 2006 00:08:32 GMT