W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2000

RE: A personal plea for peace and just a wee bit of patience (and I do mean a wee bit)

From: Box, Don <dbox@develop.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 10:38:21 -0800
Message-ID: <824EAE80328AD311B2590090276267820AE317@INFOSERVER>
To: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
Cc: "Box, Don" <dbox@develop.com>, SOAP@discuss.develop.com, "Tim O'Reilly (E-mail)" <tim@oreilly.com>, timbl@w3.org, tbray@textuality.com, ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us, Daniel.Veillard@w3.org, connolly@w3.org, eric@w3.org, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (E-mail)" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Steve Vinoski (E-mail)" <vinoski@iona.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Constantine Plotnikov [mailto:cap@mail.novosoft.ru]
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 6:36 AM
> To: Dave Winer
> Cc: Box, Don; SOAP@discuss.develop.com; Tim O'Reilly 
> (E-mail); timbl@w3.org; tbray@textuality.com; 
> ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us; Daniel.Veillard@w3.org; 
> connolly@w3.org; eric@w3.org; xml-dist-app@w3.org; Henrik 
> Frystyk Nielsen (E-mail); Steve Vinoski (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: A personal plea for peace and just a wee bit of 
> patience (and I do mean a wee bit)
> "Box, Don" wrote:
> > 
> > No one had concrete criticisms of the SOAP serialization 
> format. That does
> > not mean it is perfect. However, it means that no one who 
> has looked at the
> > spec has any credible technical show-stoppers that they are 
> willing to share
> > in an open forum.
> > 
> I personally like XMI 1.1 serialization algorithm more. 

Many of us have familiar at XMI and MOF in general. However, I believe the
OMG is in the process of revamping the XMI encoding, which was done prior to
namespaces and schema language. One of my personal goals is to make obvious
how XMI fits into this picture.

Received on Friday, 3 March 2000 13:34:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:09 UTC