Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> writes: > PassiveTeX does indeed expand some shorthands now. Primarily driven by > the RenderX test files, actually, as I find them a useful benchmark. I > really resent having spent the time on it :-} > > And I still think that 'font="10pt Helvetica bold"' is horrible in > anyone's book. Thats not a shorthand, its plain laziness! Though it was me to scatter shorthands throughout RenderX testcases, I 100% agree :-). 'Font' is an incredible mess (second only to 'background'); I also regret the time we have spent to implement/test it. >'border-style=solid' I find more comprehensible. If it is given a single value, it's OK. Then it can be treated as a special property that sets default values to 'border-{side}-style' stuff. The spec already contains properties that equal another property by default - 'border-{side}-color' take their default values from 'color'. However, in CSS 'border-style' can assume multi-token values (up to 4 style specifiers). IMHO, this should be dropped. Regards, NikolaiReceived on Tuesday, 13 February 2001 19:29:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:06:08 GMT