David Carlisle writes: > defaults to some fixed or null value). But to handle shorthands you have > to do this by hand, picking them up parsing the compound value, and > assigning to the lower level property macros. It is a lot of extra work > for essentially no gain. Ie if I liked the shorthands I could probably > implement them, but since they seem like an unpleasant intrusion into > the language the incentive isn't really there. (Maybe Sebastian will do > it anyway, as you say: user pressure....) PassiveTeX does indeed expand some shorthands now. Primarily driven by the RenderX test files, actually, as I find them a useful benchmark. I really resent having spent the time on it :-} And I still think that 'font="10pt Helvetica bold"' is horrible in anyone's book. Thats not a shorthand, its plain laziness! `border-style=solid' I find more comprehensible. SebastianReceived on Tuesday, 13 February 2001 18:09:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:06:08 GMT