W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: xs:QName in Schema 1.1

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:20:25 +0100
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
Message-ID: <a9kbq1h89nt4ir2bb9i5a6pjrbd6aopmvv@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> > Where is clarification required -- I wasn't aware there was 
>> > any area where is was not clear that unprefixed QNames are 
>> > default-namespace qualified.
>> The only thing that Schema Part 2 (section 3.2.18) says about the mapping of
>> the lexical space to the value space for QNames is the Note: "The mapping
>> between literals in the ·lexical space· and values in the ·value space· of
>> QName requires a namespace declaration to be in scope for the context in
>> which QName is used."
>This will be clarified in a forthcoming erratum, sorry.

Where in http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata is this erratum?
Received on Sunday, 18 December 2005 21:26:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:10 GMT