Re: xs:QName in Schema 1.1

* Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> > Where is clarification required -- I wasn't aware there was 
>> > any area where is was not clear that unprefixed QNames are 
>> > default-namespace qualified.
>> 
>> The only thing that Schema Part 2 (section 3.2.18) says about the mapping of
>> the lexical space to the value space for QNames is the Note: "The mapping
>> between literals in the ·lexical space· and values in the ·value space· of
>> QName requires a namespace declaration to be in scope for the context in
>> which QName is used."
>
>This will be clarified in a forthcoming erratum, sorry.

Where in http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata is this erratum?