W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: xs:QName in Schema 1.1

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:58:20 +0000
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b8xuhihub.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Hash: SHA1

Bjoern Hoehrmann writes:

> * Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>>> > Where is clarification required -- I wasn't aware there was 
>>> > any area where is was not clear that unprefixed QNames are 
>>> > default-namespace qualified.
>>> The only thing that Schema Part 2 (section 3.2.18) says about the mapping of
>>> the lexical space to the value space for QNames is the Note: "The mapping
>>> between literals in the ·lexical space· and values in the ·value space· of
>>> QName requires a namespace declaration to be in scope for the context in
>>> which QName is used."
>>This will be clarified in a forthcoming erratum, sorry.
> Where in http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata is this erratum?

1) It's not out yet;
2) It will be in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/xmlschema-errata when it

- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Monday, 19 December 2005 08:58:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:04 UTC