W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 1853] RQ-141b define and use "ancestor" in mapping rules for simple type defns (Requirement)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 03:43:10 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1EnSyU-0006UX-37@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Additional Comments From davep@iit.edu  2005-12-17 03:43 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> A definition of ancestor was included in the omnibus proposal
> sent to the Working Group 31 August 2005; the relevant parts of
> the proposal were approved in September 2005.  They have now
> been integrated into the status quo document, so I am marking
> this issue resolved.

I had the feeling that the intent of this requirement was not only to
introduce the term but also to go through the document to see if
there are other places where it can be used to simplify wording that
was correct but convoluted.  I wonder if Henry actually has made such
a pass.
Received on Saturday, 17 December 2005 03:43:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:04 UTC