W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Part 2: Datatypes

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 08 Apr 2001 10:24:51 +0100
To: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
Cc: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5belv3lp5o.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com> writes:


[spelling error corrected]

> Sorry, I'm sure this has been asked several times already:
> Committee-endorsed XML Schema namespace prefix convention: xs:? xsd:? both?
> other? none?

No WG opinion, as far as I know.  I quite like the fact that the
primer and the structures spec. use _different_ prefixes -- it
emphasises that the prefix is not in fact the issue.

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2001 05:24:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:56 UTC