W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 1999

RE: minOccur, maxOccur

From: Julian Reschke <reschke@medicaldataservice.de>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 07:59:23 +0200
To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>, "xml-dev" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <000501be9b73$6b186de0$cf00a8c0@nbreschke>

> From: owner-xml-dev@ic.ac.uk [mailto:owner-xml-dev@ic.ac.uk]On Behalf Of
> Paul Prescod
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 11:20 PM
> To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org; xml-dev
> Subject: minOccur, maxOccur
>
>
> I dispute the usefulness of minOccur and maxOccur. I would like to hear
> about where people would use these features. I find that people often want
> them but can find a clearer way of expressing their document type when
> they are not available.

Interesting statemen. How about an example. How would you define a schema
where <a> can only contain <b> and <c>, each of which exactly one time?
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 1999 01:59:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:45 GMT