W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: XLink 1.1: "XML document" undefined

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:23:27 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <pmhat11cciohp6ce7dsumb99k8lrlsejt3@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Norman Walsh wrote:
>| XML 1.2/2.0 documents,
>Why should XLink make more explicit reference to this possibility than
>other specifications that use XML?


>| documents
>| that violate MUST requirements in XML 1.0 without causing fatal errors,
>Are there any?


>No, I don't think it would, but the Core WG couldn't really tell what
>your question was.

I want "Any linkbase specified as the ending resource of an arc with
this special value must be an XML document" to be rephrased such that
I can easily derive an algorithm from the definition that would tell
whether some XLink markup meets the constraint, e.g. to add support
for XLink 1.1 to the W3C Markup Validator.
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 21:22:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:25 UTC