www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org from October to December 2005 by author

Anne van Kesteren

Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling (Wednesday, 14 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? (Thursday, 20 October)
Re: [xlink11] integration with existing markup (Tuesday, 11 October)

Bert Bos

Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS (Wednesday, 12 October)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling (Wednesday, 14 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? (Tuesday, 11 October)

Felix Sasaki

Re: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding) from the i18n core wg (Monday, 7 November)
Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 (Thursday, 27 October)
Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 (Wednesday, 12 October)

George Chavchanidze

Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? (Thursday, 20 October)

Henry S. Thompson

Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? (Friday, 21 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? (Wednesday, 19 October)

Ian Hickson

Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS (Wednesday, 12 October)

IwanUswak@gmx.de

Good start - but simplify the system !!! (Saturday, 3 December)

Jim Owens

I just want to use a link! What now? (Wednesday, 12 October)

Mark Baker

Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC (Sunday, 23 October)
Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC (Wednesday, 12 October)

Martin Duerst

RE: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding) from the i18n core wg (Friday, 4 November)
Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 (Monday, 31 October)
Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 (Friday, 28 October)

Norman Walsh

Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: Animation (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: Security Considerations (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: default xmlns attribute values (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1 (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: xlink:href requirements (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: "URI reference" "checking" (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: XML Base confusion (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: "XML document" undefined (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: "markup conformance testing" (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? (Friday, 16 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference (Wednesday, 14 December)
Re: I just want to use a link! What now? (Wednesday, 14 December)
Re: Good start - but simplify the system !!! (Wednesday, 14 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling (Wednesday, 14 December)
Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling (Tuesday, 8 November)
[closed] Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC (Tuesday, 8 November)
Re: XLink 1.1 harmonization with RDF (Tuesday, 8 November)
[closed] Re: XLink 1.1: http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd import (Wednesday, 19 October)
Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC (Wednesday, 19 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS (Wednesday, 12 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1 (Wednesday, 12 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling (Wednesday, 12 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Security Considerations (Wednesday, 12 October)
Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 (Tuesday, 11 October)
[closed] Re: Base URI of a processing instruction (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: [xlink11] integration with existing markup (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: xlink:href requirements (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: "markup conformance testing" (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking (Tuesday, 11 October)
[closed] Re: XLink 1.1: 5.2 example incorrect (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: "XML document" undefined (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? (Tuesday, 11 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? (Tuesday, 11 October)
[spam] Re: your advertizing is not as good as it could be (Tuesday, 11 October)

Simon St.Laurent

Re: I just want to use a link! What now? (Thursday, 13 October)
Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? (Tuesday, 11 October)

Last message date: Friday, 16 December 2005 20:56:14 UTC