Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling

* Norman Walsh wrote:
>| XLink 1.0 does not define error handling behavior. It simply
>| identifies those situations which are errors and leaves their handling
>| to the application.
>|
>| While the WG recognizes that more detailed information about erorr
>| handling might be valuable, if consensus could be reached on what that
>| handling should be in the wide variety of applications that might use
>| XLink, it does not consider such additions to be within the narrow
>| scope of its charter for XLink 1.1. Consequently, the WG does not
>| expect to make any changes with respect to error handling for XLink
>| 1.1.
>|
>| Please let us know if you find this explanation satisfactory.

>Have you had a chance to consider if the explanation above is
>satisfactory?

Well, from http://www.w3.org/mid/87oe5valhu.fsf@nwalsh.com I understand
that whenever some element violates XLink 1.1 conformance requirements
that implementations must behave as if there is no XLink markup relevant
to the element; could you give a non-compliant fragment where this would
not apply, i.e., where error handling is not defined? I am not sure yet
what to make of these responses, but at the moment they seem rather in-
consistent to me.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/