W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: [xml-dev] Re: "There are six XLink elements" - True or False? Discuss

From: Eve L. Maler <eve.maler@sun.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 12:01:19 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3C8A400A.3010207@sun.com>
To: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
CC: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Ah, but there are only two "XLink *linking* elements": simple and 
extended.  The other four "XLink elements" are used in various ways to 
supplement the definition of links.

I guess we should have called them the six "XLink architectural 
forms". :-)

	Eve

Ronald Bourret wrote:

> "XLink linking element" is formally defined, "XLink element" is
> informally defined. From section 2.1:
> 
>    [Definition: It is made explicit by an XLink linking element,
>    which is an XLink-conforming XML element that asserts the
>    existence of a link.] There are six XLink elements; only two
>    of them are considered linking elements. The others provide
>    various pieces of information that describe the characteristics
>    of a link.
> 
> I also don't think this is confusing. I sat down to really read the spec
> for the first time the other day and had no problems with this.
> 
> -- Ron

-- 
Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 00:25:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:43 GMT