W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: [xml-dev] "There are six XLink elements" - True or False? Dis cuss

From: DuCharme, Bob (LNG) <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:48:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <68A404048D91DB4E8DB28B90723BB29CC54704@lnxdayexch07.lexis-nexis.com>
To: "'AndrewWatt2000@aol.com'" <AndrewWatt2000@aol.com>, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Andrew Watt writes:

>Chapter 2.1 of the XLink Recommendation states, "There are six XLink
elements 
>..."

>But, a careful search of the XLink Recommendation reveals only XLink 
>attributes. No XLink elements in the final Recommendation ... at least in
the 
>sense of elements in the XLink namespace ... although elements in the XLink

>namespace had appeared in earlier drafts of the XLink specification.

Yes, for example as described by sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the December 1999
draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xlink-19991220. I would chalk up the
misleading nature of the sentence you cite as an editorial cleanup oversight
when they took out the dedicated element type option.

Bob DuCharme        www.snee.com/bob             <bob@
snee.com>  see http://www.snee.com/bob/xsltquickly for
info on book "XSLT Quickly" from Manning Publications.
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 05:41:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:43 GMT