- From: DuCharme, Bob (LNG) <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:48:10 -0500 (EST)
- To: "'AndrewWatt2000@aol.com'" <AndrewWatt2000@aol.com>, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Andrew Watt writes: >Chapter 2.1 of the XLink Recommendation states, "There are six XLink elements >..." >But, a careful search of the XLink Recommendation reveals only XLink >attributes. No XLink elements in the final Recommendation ... at least in the >sense of elements in the XLink namespace ... although elements in the XLink >namespace had appeared in earlier drafts of the XLink specification. Yes, for example as described by sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the December 1999 draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xlink-19991220. I would chalk up the misleading nature of the sentence you cite as an editorial cleanup oversight when they took out the dedicated element type option. Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <bob@ snee.com> see http://www.snee.com/bob/xsltquickly for info on book "XSLT Quickly" from Manning Publications.
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 05:41:30 UTC