Berin Lautenbach wrote: > Bizarre. I still get a bad sig check. Reference OK, but the HMAC > fails. Yet all the other authentication signatures work. I'm assuming > that it goes through the process to derive an authentication signature > (xor with 0x01 etc.)? The derived key is FD823F87979E3E42D4E1D4D020C4B98BF231E248 > I wonder if I'm using an out-of-date version. My samples are dated > 27/2/2005 - was there a later set? FYI, I just downloaded the .zip from the mail archive. Martin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:31:06 GMT