W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Recover Request

From: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:12:14 +0000
Message-ID: <18ec59cc0603061112n23bbd76cveb84d8c5d817e503@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Berin Lautenbach" <berin@wingsofhermes.org>, "Martin Pirker" <Martin.Pirker@iaik.tugraz.at>
Cc: "www-xkms@w3.org" <www-xkms@w3.org>
>I'm assuming  that it goes through the process to derive an authentication
signature
> (xor with 0x01 etc.)?
Yes it does.

> 27/2/2005 - was there a later set?
No.

This is the "converted" quantity for the string A8YUT VUHHU C9H29 8Y43U
H9J3I 23:
[41] [38] [59] [55] [54] [20] [56] [55] [48] [48] [55] [20] [43] [39] [48]
[32] [39] [20] [38] [59]
[34] [33] [55] [20] [48] [39] [4a] [33] [49] [20] [32] [33]

and, like Martin indicated, this is the key.
[fd] [82] [3f] [87] [97] [9e] [3e] [42] [d4] [e1] [d4] [d0] [20] [c4] [b9]
[8b] [f2] [31] [e2] [48]

Regards,
Tommy

On 3/6/06, Martin Pirker <Martin.Pirker@iaik.tugraz.at> wrote:
>
> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> > Bizarre.  I still get a bad sig check.  Reference OK, but the HMAC
> > fails.  Yet all the other authentication signatures work.  I'm assuming
> > that it goes through the process to derive an authentication signature
> > (xor with 0x01 etc.)?
>
> The derived key is
> FD823F87979E3E42D4E1D4D020C4B98BF231E248
>
> > I wonder if I'm using an out-of-date version.  My samples are dated
> > 27/2/2005 - was there a later set?
>
> FYI, I just downloaded the .zip from the mail archive.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 6 March 2006 19:12:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:44 UTC