Re: [bug?] Re: Issue 332-tl6: Use of RespondWith from Jose Kahan on 2005-04-13 (www-xkms@w3.org from April 2005)

From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:24:30 +0200
To: Shivaram Mysore <shivarammysore@yahoo.com>
Cc: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>, XKMS WG <www-xkms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050413102430.GB22347@rakahanga.inrialpes.fr>

Hi Shivaram,

I changed the text exactly as you proposed:

On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Shivaram Mysore wrote:
>  
> [128a]The RespondWith element MUST NOT be a direct child of a CompoundRequest
> element. Each request that is encapsulated inside a CompoundRequest
> element may or may not have its own RespondWith element child.
> 
> Jose, please make this change in the PR-DRAFT.

You mean PR-PUB?

-jose

Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 10:24:40 UTC