W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Misc editorial

From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:15:58 +0200
To: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050413101558.GA22347@rakahanga.inrialpes.fr>
Hi Tommy,

Shivaram and I made the change to[1] to say:

If the initial request included the optional <PendingNotification>
element, the XKMS service notifies the client about the completion of the
request processing using the notification mechanism specified in this

Do you think it is precise enough or should I add the out of band
notification mechanism indication, which you hinted here below? I think
it's good as it is. If there's no notification message precised, the
client has either to go poll the server to know if the request has been
completed or use an out-of-band mechanism as you explained.

Anyway, feedback is always welcome :)

On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:57:44PM +0100, Tommy Lindberg wrote:
> You may want adjust it to reflect the fact that <PendingNotification>
> is optional i.e. it may not be present and that the service therefore
> uses an out of band notification mechanism.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-PR-PUB/PR-PUB-xkms-part-1.html

Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 10:16:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:43 UTC