Re: xkms f2f minutes comments

Yassir

Yes, I agree - we wanted the extensibility without confusing things by 
moving everything into KeyInfo.

I think what you have written (below) should be incorporated into the 
minutes of the F2F.

< Frederick


Yassir Elley wrote:
> Frederick Hirsch wrote:
> 
> 
>>10) I also thought we discussed the issue of KeyInfo vs KeyBinding and
>>decided to retain the distinction and not extend KeyInfo
>>
> 
> 
> The issue was that we want KeyBindingType to be extensible.
> Currently, KeyBindingType includes ds:KeyInfo, which includes an <any> element.
> However, we felt that ds:KeyInfo is really something to be put in a Signature, and
> we wanted a separate extensibility mechanism. The resolution was that we
> would add an <any> element as a child of KeyBindingType.
> 
> I have an action item to refactor all the Request and Response stuff, including the
> KeyBindingType definition. As part of that, I will add the <any> element to KeyBindingType.
> 
> -Yassir.
> 
>