Re: xkms requirments - SOAP 1.1/1.2 wording revision

This wording looks fine to me.

-Yassir.

Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> We have revised the wording of requirements regarding SOAP 1.1 versus
> 1.2 as follows. Please indicate if there is an issue with this wording.
>
> Is it acceptable in  2.1.5 to refer to "Candidate Recommendation"
> instead of Recommendation, for consistency with 2.1.4?
> ---
>
> 2.1.4)
> The specification MUST provide a binding to XML Protocol (SOAP 1.2),
> provided that the SOAP 1.2 specification has reached Candidate
> Recommendation (CR) status prior to the XKMS WG completing its work. In
> this case the specification SHOULD also provide a binding to SOAP 1.1
> (for interoperability purposes).
>
> If SOAP 1.2 has not reached CR status then the specification MUST
> provide a binding to SOAP 1.1.
>
> The XKMS specification SOAP binding is required to profile SOAP for
> interoperability, including use of document literal encoding.
>
> [ SOAP ] [XMLProtocol] [List(Blair Dillaway)].
>
> 2.1.5)
> XKMS services MUST implement SOAP 1.2 once that specification has
> achieved Candidate Recommendation status.