W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

Re: CR144: Incoherent reference

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:10:49 +0100
Cc: "'WSD Public'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-id: <45D350A9.4080401@crf.canon.fr>

DONE as you say.

JJ.

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> The difference between the two references is whether query parameters are
> added automatically [6.7.2] or not [6.7.1].
>
> For the SOAP request-response MEP, AIUI we want to honor the http:location
> template, but if there are leftover items we don't add them as query
> parameters since the whole XML payload will appear in the SOAP body.  The
> intention of the CR144 resolution was to correct the overstepping we did in
> CR133.  So, I believe 6.7.1 is the correct reference.
>
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
>> Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau
>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 9:50 AM
>> To: WSD Public
>> Subject: CR144: Incoherent reference
>>
>>
>> Amongst other things, which are fine and already implemented, the
>> resolution for CR144 asks to set ImmediateDestination according to:
>> - Section 6.7.1 Serialization of the instance data in parts of the HTTP
>> request
>>
>> However, CR133 asked to set this instead according to (thus mirroring
>> SOAP-Response):
>> - Section 6.7.2 Serialization as application/x-www-form-urlencoded
>>
>> Which is the correct reference?
>>
>> JJ.
>>     
>
>
>   
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:11:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT