W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2006

RE: New "Additional MEPs" document

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:11:35 -0700
To: "'Amelia A Lewis'" <alewis@tibco.com>, "'Jean-Jacques Moreau'" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007d01c6f9e2$94c93fe0$3901a8c0@DELLICIOUS>

A question - as a consequence of removing these meps (actually as a
consequence of not having bindings that support them), one will not see an
<inFault> element in a WSDL that uses the standard bindings.  <inFault>
exists only to support extended MEPs in conjunction with a an extended
binding.  I.e.  <inFault> is in the same category as messageLabel, used for
supporting extensions but unnecessary when sticking to the basics.  Correct?

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:07 AM
> To: Jean-Jacques Moreau
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: New "Additional MEPs" document
> 
> 
> Thank you, Jean-Jacques.
> 
> I will undertake the revisions as soon as I get a chance.  Jonathan, it
> probably won't happen by tomorrow's conference call.  However, could you
> set the deadline for my outstanding action to next week?  I'll try to have
> the Note completed and ready for approval by the working group by that
> time.
> 
> Amy!
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:17:05 +0200
> Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr> wrote:
> 
> >Amy,
> >
> >As part of my action, I have just commited a new document that will
> >contain the additional MEPs moved out of Part 2. The file is available
> >under W3C CVS as :
> >
> >    /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-additional-meps.xml
> >
> >I have kept the introduction, notations, namespaces and MEP sections
> >as is, leaving you the pleasure of deleting whatever you deem
> >unnecessary. I've compressed the change log**.
> >
> >I've also removed the MEPs in Part 2 which are not used in our
> >bindings. Namely, I've kept only in-only, robust-in-only and in-out.
> >
> >I believe this discharges me of my action item.
> >
> >JJ.
> >
> >** Interestingly, the change log represents 1/4th the number of lines
> >of Part 2.
> 
> 
> --
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Senior Architect
> TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 16:11:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:42 GMT