- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:33:02 -0000
- To: <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> Please find in attachment an attempt to capture some constraints > relating the mep of an operation with its message children. > These constraints are written as schematron assertions. This may ease > the authoring of WSDL documents. cool! > Paul, with all the good work you have done on the XML data binding WG, I > would be grateful if you could have a quick look at it. Er, OK. Bah, my webmail now blocks .xml as a dangerous attachment?! Looks at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/att-0076/meprules.xml Seems sound - I prefer to "assert" constraints and "report" interesting valid content, but that's a style thing. I wonder how many other constraints we can express in such as schema, are we planning to make this schema normative to live alongside the XML Schema? We could embed such co-constraints into the normative XML Schema, but I much prefer to keep XPaths out of XML Schema documents as a "separation of concerns". Paul
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 12:41:25 UTC