W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > December 2006

RE: Agenda: 6 December 2006 WS Description telcon [30 min earlier]

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:09:59 -0800
To: "'Jonathan Marsh'" <jonathan@wso2.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <016501c718ca$e7a7c220$3401a8c0@DELLICIOUS>

That is, December 8th.  Unless you're not Tony.  Then it's the 7th. 

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 1:44 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda: 6 December 2006 WS Description telcon [30 min earlier]
> 
> 
> 0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
> 
> See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
> information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
> 
> If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
> before
> the start of the telcon.
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Nov/0013.html
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
> [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Agenda
> 
> 1. Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
>       Anish Karmarkar, Glen Daniels, Jacek Kopecky, Charlton Baretto,
>       Roberto Chinnici, Gilbert Pilz, Youenn Fablet, Jean-Jacques Moreau
>       Philippe le Hegaret, Tony Rogers, Tom Jordahl, Amy Lewis
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2.  Approval of minutes:
>   - Nov 30 [.1]
> 
> [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/att-0136/20061130-
> ws
> -desc-minutes.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3.  Review of Action items [.1].
> 
> [Interop]
> ?         2006-11-30: [interop] John Kaputin to create a test case
>                       with "required=false".
> DONE [.4] 2006-11-30: [interop] Jonathan to allow different extensions
>                       per implementation.
> DONE [.3] 2006-11-30: [interop] Jonathan to move Echo-2G into bad bucket.
> 
> [WG]
> ?         2006-09-21: Jonathan to check periodically that SPARQL has added
>                       schemaLocation.
> ?         2006-10-12: pdowney to review the Schema WG note on versioning
>                       in 1.1.
> ?         2006-11-30: Jonathan will propose a plan for publishing
>                       component model interchange format as a note.
> DONE [.5] 2006-11-30: Jonathan to take the proposal to the CG that we
>                       can take the work, as long as our charter is
>                       extended and as long as we can get our primary
>                       deliverables done first.
> ?         2006-11-30: Charlton to review WS-Policy LC.
> DONE [.6] 2006-11-30: Jonathan to look at whether WS-I BP profiles
>                       Detail children (to only one).
> ?         2006-11-30: Jonathan will draft a paragraph to talk about
>                       what parts of SOAP we don't support.
> 
> Current Editorial Action Items
> 
> Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0137.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0000.html
> [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-cg/2006Dec/0003.html
> [.6]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/att-0136/20061130-
> ws
> -desc-minutes.html#item14, 5th line
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4.  Administrivia
>   - WSDL 1.1 Component Designators [.1]
>     - Canoncialization [.2]
>   - LC reviews
>     + Databinding [.3]
>     + Policy [.4]
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0044.html
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0009.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Nov/0010.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0127.html
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 5.  MTOM Description
>   - CG cancelled this week.
>   - Paul's proposal [.1]
>   - Jonathan/Asir's counter-proposal [.2]
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0029.html
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0016.html
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 6.  Issue CR082: Header blocks in wrpc:signature [.1]
>   - Unaccepted resolution [.2]
>   - Jacek's responses [.3]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR082
> [.2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-
> comments/2006Oct/0037.htm
> l
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Oct/0073.html
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 7.  Issue CR092: Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [.1]
>   - WS-I BP doesn't constrain this.
>   - CR92/93 proposal [.2]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR092
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0017.html
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 8.  Issue CR093: Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR093
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 9.  Issue CR094: Assertion SOAPBinding-2503001 [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR094
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 10. Issue CR095: Part 2 - {element declaration} property for SOAP
>                  Header Block component [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR095
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 11. Issue CR096: Assertions that are not assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR096
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 12. Issue CR097: Assertions that are not assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR097
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 13. Issue CR098: Assertions that are not assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR098
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 14. Issue CR099: Assertions that are not assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR099
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 15. Issue CR100: Duplicate assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR100
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 16. Issue CR101: Duplicate assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR101
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 17. Issue CR102: Duplicate assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR102
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 18. Issue CR103: Duplicate assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR103
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 19. Issue CR104: One more duplicate assertion [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR104
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 20. Issue CR105: More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR105
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 21. Issue CR106: More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR106
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 22. Issue CR107: More Duplicate and Non-Assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR107
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 23. Issue CR108: Do MessageLabel-0006 and MessageLabel-0014 state the
>                  same requirement? [.1]
>   - Arthur agrees [.2]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR108
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0085.html
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 24. Issue CR109: SOAP Fault code issue [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR109
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 25. Issue CR110: Semantics of {http cookies} Property. [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR110
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 26. Issue CR111: Mapping WSDL meps to the HTTP binding [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR111
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 27. Issue CR112: HTTP Location property definition [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR112
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 28. Issue CR113: SOAP Response query string issue [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR113
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 29. Issue CR114: Mapping WSDL MEPs to SOAP MEPs [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR114
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 30. Issue CR115: Suggested editorial change for assertion Import-0072 [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR115
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 31. Issue CR116: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the
>                  http location [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR116
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 32. Issue CR117: Re: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the
>                  http location [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR117
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 33. Issue CR118: Suggested removal of 2 assertions [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR118
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 34. Issue CR119: Missing attribute in section 6.2 [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR119
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 35. Issue CR120: SOAP Response and IRI style [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR120
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 36. Issue CR121: WSDL enhancement request [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR121
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 37. Issue CR021: Re: WSDL describing Interface operation safety [.1]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR021
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 00:10:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:43 GMT