- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 23:09:34 -0500
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF72988D55.C35EC4E1-ON8525723A.0083D292-8525723B.0016DC2B@ca.ibm.com>
Philippe Concerning this review, I recommend they add the same canonicalization rules we have for WSDL 2.0 frag id's. ----------------- The Web Services Policy Working Group is currently working on a Working Group Note for WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers [1]. Those identifiers would then be used in the external policy attachment mechanism [2] as WSDL 1.1 domain expressions. 1. Would the WSDL WG object to the publication of the document by the WS Policy WG? 2. Would the WSDL WG be interested in reviewing the document and provide feedback to the WS Policy WG? Regards, Philippe [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20061102/#ExternalPolicyAttachment Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 04:09:44 UTC