W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2005

Re: Up-to-date version of Part 2 for review; comments

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@wso2.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:13:31 +0600
Message-ID: <437A79AB.7010708@wso2.com>
To: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
CC: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>, www-ws-desc@w3.org

Tom Jordahl wrote:
> I see the same behavior as Sanjiva. Without 'gunk' it looks strange.
> 
> How about just using "OK"?
> 
> Also, I don't "get" the table.  The check marks are left justified;
> there is GET,DELETE and "..." rows in the "HTTP request with method"
> column but not in the third, fourth and fifth.
> 
> Perhaps the following would help
> - Remove the table border around the operations (GET/DELETE) and just
> put the operations in parenthesis: "Without Message body (GET, etc)",
> "With Message Body (POST, etc)".
> - Center the "OK" in the middle of the columns (application/xml,
> multipart/form-data, etc.)

I actually don't get the entire table. IMO the original table I drew on 
the whiteboard (which Paul pasted a picture of at [1]) was clearer because 
  it simply says how to construct (or what can go in) the URI vs. payload 
for each HTTP operation. I recognize I have a biased view in this case 
however!

Sanjiva.
[1] http://www.flickr.com/photos/psd/47263522
-- 
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
email: sanjiva@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 787 6880; fax: +1 509 691 2000

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform."
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 00:14:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:37 GMT