W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2004

RE: use of wsoap: vs. wsoap12:

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 19:10:49 -0700
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B6338022079C0@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

This is an editorial suggestion for the spec, right? We're not saying
that people HAVE to use these prefixes in their WSDL documents, are we?

Gudge 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Sent: 16 May 2004 04:59
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: use of wsoap: vs. wsoap12:
> 
> 
> In the bindings doc we say wsoap: for the SOAP binding 
> elements. However,
> in the part1 doc we say the SOAP 1.2 binding will use wsoap12 as the
> prefix.
> 
> I'd like to change the part1 doc to say that the WSDL 2.0 
> defined SOAP 1.2
> binding will use the wsoap: prefix. 
> 
> If someone defines a SOAP 1.1 binding then we can ask that they use 
> wsoap11 ..
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 16 May 2004 22:11:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT