Yep that's right .. just an NS prefix; so purely editorial to make the docs consistent. Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 8:10 AM Subject: RE: use of wsoap: vs. wsoap12: > This is an editorial suggestion for the spec, right? We're not saying > that people HAVE to use these prefixes in their WSDL documents, are we? > > Gudge > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > > Sent: 16 May 2004 04:59 > > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > Subject: use of wsoap: vs. wsoap12: > > > > > > In the bindings doc we say wsoap: for the SOAP binding > > elements. However, > > in the part1 doc we say the SOAP 1.2 binding will use wsoap12 as the > > prefix. > > > > I'd like to change the part1 doc to say that the WSDL 2.0 > > defined SOAP 1.2 > > binding will use the wsoap: prefix. > > > > If someone defines a SOAP 1.1 binding then we can ask that they use > > wsoap11 .. > > > > Any objections? > > > > Sanjiva. > > > >Received on Sunday, 16 May 2004 22:42:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:48 UTC