W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2004

Re: use of wsoap: vs. wsoap12:

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 08:42:16 +0600
Message-ID: <02e601c43bb8$91a24a90$6a01a8c0@LANKABOOK>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Yep that's right .. just an NS prefix; so purely editorial to make
the docs consistent.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 8:10 AM
Subject: RE: use of wsoap: vs. wsoap12:


> This is an editorial suggestion for the spec, right? We're not saying
> that people HAVE to use these prefixes in their WSDL documents, are we?
> 
> Gudge 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> > Sent: 16 May 2004 04:59
> > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > Subject: use of wsoap: vs. wsoap12:
> > 
> > 
> > In the bindings doc we say wsoap: for the SOAP binding 
> > elements. However,
> > in the part1 doc we say the SOAP 1.2 binding will use wsoap12 as the
> > prefix.
> > 
> > I'd like to change the part1 doc to say that the WSDL 2.0 
> > defined SOAP 1.2
> > binding will use the wsoap: prefix. 
> > 
> > If someone defines a SOAP 1.1 binding then we can ask that they use 
> > wsoap11 ..
> > 
> > Any objections?
> > 
> > Sanjiva.
> > 
> >
Received on Sunday, 16 May 2004 22:42:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT