- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:58:52 -0500
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
At 07:42 AM 3/23/2004 +0600, you wrote: >. . . >Do we need to say somewhere that the document must be a legal XML >document first?? Otherwise there can be illegal stuff in an unused >binding and we'd still happily allow it; >which IMO simply must not >be the case. Maybe XML compliance is implied somewhere? >. . . . I think XML compliance is implied already, because WSDL is defined in terms of the XML infoset, rather than the syntax. (Any XML Infoset guru should please correct me if I'm wrong on this.) -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 10:59:55 UTC