W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Processor conformance: fault on non-conformant input

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:58:52 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040323102301.026c2338@localhost>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org

At 07:42 AM 3/23/2004 +0600, you wrote:
>. . .
>Do we need to say somewhere that the document must be a legal XML
>document first?? Otherwise there can be illegal stuff in an unused
>binding and we'd still happily allow it;
>which IMO simply must not
>be the case. Maybe XML compliance is implied somewhere?
>. . . .

I think XML compliance is implied already, because WSDL is defined in terms 
of the XML infoset, rather than the syntax.  (Any XML Infoset guru should 
please correct me if I'm wrong on this.)


-- 
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 10:59:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT