W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Processor conformance: fault on non-conformant input

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:40:31 -0500
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com, dbooth@w3.org, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <20040323104031.5f88a855.alewis@tibco.com>

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:56:11 +0600
Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> I want the IBM processor to handle that WSDL and the SOAP binding
> in it just fine and simply skip the proprietary .Net binding which
> the IBM processor didn't understand anyway. All of that in a fully
> spec-compliant manner.
> 
> That requires going with the wording our resident spec lawyer DBooth
> recommended.

+1.  I think David's language is appropriate.  I think that the problem
of validating an entire WSDL is a separate issue from defining processor
conformance.

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Architect/Principal Engineer
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 10:43:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT