W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Wording on targetNamespace document

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:30:16 +0100
Message-ID: <405F0688.3090102@crf.canon.fr>
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Cc: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>, www-ws-desc@w3.org

Was going to implement this one, but apparently it's been done already!


Martin Gudgin wrote:

> +1 
> Gudge 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
>>[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth
>>Sent: 19 March 2004 12:35
>>To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
>>Subject: Wording on targetNamespace document
>>I just noticed that the wording in section 2.1.1 about the 
>>targetNamespace document would (inadvertently?) prohibit two 
>>logical WSDL documents[1] from defining the same service.  I 
>>assume this wording was unintentional, since there was a 
>>significant thread[2] about whether we should try to make 
>>this this prohibition, and the WG did not decide to do so.
>>I suggest fixing this with the following wording changes.  In 
>>the existing section 2.1.1 sentence:
>>If the service description is split into multiple documents 
>>(which may be combined as needed via 4.1 Including 
>>Descriptions), then the targetNamespace attribute information 
>>item  SHOULD resolve to a master document which includes all 
>>the WSDL documents for that namespace.
>>Simply change:
>>s/If the service/If a service/
>>s/for that namespace./needed for that service description./
>>1. For explanation of "logical WSDL document" see:
>>2. Thread on "Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service":
>>David Booth
>>W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
>>Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 10:38:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:47 UTC