W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

RE: Wording on targetNamespace document

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:21:37 -0800
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B6338018B60F1@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

+1 

Gudge 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth
> Sent: 19 March 2004 12:35
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Wording on targetNamespace document
> 
> 
> I just noticed that the wording in section 2.1.1 about the 
> targetNamespace document would (inadvertently?) prohibit two 
> logical WSDL documents[1] from defining the same service.  I 
> assume this wording was unintentional, since there was a 
> significant thread[2] about whether we should try to make 
> this this prohibition, and the WG did not decide to do so.
> 
> I suggest fixing this with the following wording changes.  In 
> the existing section 2.1.1 sentence:
> [[
> If the service description is split into multiple documents 
> (which may be combined as needed via 4.1 Including 
> Descriptions), then the targetNamespace attribute information 
> item  SHOULD resolve to a master document which includes all 
> the WSDL documents for that namespace.
> ]]
> 
> Simply change:
> s/If the service/If a service/
> s/for that namespace./needed for that service description./
> 
> 
> ----------
> 1. For explanation of "logical WSDL document" see:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Nov/0085.html
> 2. Thread on "Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service":
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Dec/0045.html
> 
> 
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 20 March 2004 04:11:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT