W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2004

Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:49:25 -0500
To: WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20040128074925.N2245@www.markbaker.ca>

On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:01:42AM -0500, Mark Baker wrote:
> What I think we need is some additional styles (per the style AII),
> including;

One important thing I forgot to mention was that I believe we need a
means of specifying the "style" in the message itself, rather than just
in the WSDL.  I think that a simple extension to your proposal should
suffice.

If all this is done, then my "ambiguous interface semantics" issue goes
away, as the message would be sufficiently self-descriptive for anybody
anywhere to identify the token that represents the operation ... which
also tells you how to interpret the success or failure of that message.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2004 07:49:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:28 GMT