- From: Jim Webber <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:12:55 +0100
- To: "'Bijan Parsia'" <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, "'Tom Jordahl'" <tomj@macromedia.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Bijan: > I find myself agreeing with Tom (in spite of his liking of > *Underworld* > :)), but then, I've been easily swayed on this topic. I wonder if the > folks who find "operation" too suggestive of objectness find > attributes > similarly misleading. I have always disliked attributes since they do not fit into my "services are entities which exchnage messages" view of the world. In fact I like attributes farless than I like operation, since at least operation is just a label for an exchange of messages, whereas attributes introduce something which fundamentally does not fit here. Jim PS - Underworld is ok, I've sat through worse. Though I hear Savas liked it too :-)
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 11:13:07 UTC