W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2003

Diffs between prev WD and latest rev

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:08:35 -0800
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E02D30CF0@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Cc: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>

We have publication listed on our agenda[1] this week, under 4.1(d). To
help us with this agenda item, I've produced a list of the differences
in Part 1 between the WD we recently published[11] and the current
revision of the editor's copy[12,13].

1.    The text:

  "The target namespace represents an unambiguous name for the intended
semantics of the WSDL Infoset. The targetNamespace URI SHOULD point to a
human or machine processable document that directly or indirectly
defines the semantics of the WSDL Infoset."

was added to section 2.1.2[1,2] reflecting our decision back in October
to say something about WSDL semantics.

2.	Various changes related to operation names were made, as
detailed in[3,4]

3.	Appendix C was added as per our resolution to R120[5,6]

4.	The text in[7,8] that previously read:

  "Identical to that of <attval>application/xml</attval> as described in
[RFC 3023], section 5."

was changed to 

  "Either a syntax identical to that of <attval>application/xml</attval>
as described in [RFC 3023] section 5, or the syntax defined in C.2
Fragment Identifiers."

5.	The name attribute on <wsdl:input/>, <wsdl:output/> and
<wsdl:fault/> in <wsdl:operation> was made optional[9,10]. It was listed
as being mandatory, which was an editorial error.

Cheers

Gudge

[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml#Definitions_XMLRep
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html#Definitions_XMLRep
[3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.37.2.3&content-type=text/xml
[4]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.18.2.1&content-type=text/html
[5]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml#wsdl-uri-references
[6]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html#wsdl-uri-references
[7]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml#ietf-reg
[8]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html#ietf-reg
[9]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml#MessageReference_XMLRep
[10]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html#MessageReference_XMLRep
[11] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-20030124/
[12]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml
[13]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:09:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT